One defined integration
Two systems, one direction of flow, agreed in writing before work starts. Defined narrowly on purpose, because vague integration scope is how these projects go wrong.
Home › Services › Business systems integration
Business systems integrationAn order arrives in one system, gets typed into a second for dispatch and a third for invoicing. Nobody planned it that way; it accumulated. This connects two of those systems properly — with the error handling and logging that decide whether an integration is still working in six months, or failing quietly.
From ₹65,000 for one defined integration.
Two systems, one direction of flow, agreed in writing before work starts. Defined narrowly on purpose, because vague integration scope is how these projects go wrong.
Which field becomes which, what happens to the ones that do not match, and what the rules are when the two disagree.
Bad data stopped at the boundary rather than copied faithfully into the second system.
Retries, and a record of what failed and why. The difference between an integration that breaks loudly and one that breaks silently for a fortnight.
In a test environment first, against real records, before anything is switched on in production.
Written up so another engineer can change it. Credentials stay in your accounts.
About the price. The figure above buys the scope listed, at that price, with the exclusions stated. Anything outside it is quoted after discovery rather than estimated in advance — which is how we price everything else, and why there is no rate card on the pricing page. Taxes are shown separately. Third-party costs such as hosting, licences and API fees are billed at cost or paid on your own accounts.
Each further system is its own scope. Three connected systems is not one-and-a-half times the work of two.
New records flowing is a different job from moving years of history. Quoted separately.
Some platforms charge for the access tier an integration needs. Billed at cost or paid on your accounts.
Strongly recommended and quoted as a support arrangement — but not assumed to be included.
If the workflow underneath is broken, connecting it faster makes it worse. We will say so and quote for less work.
If there is no API, export or database route, we will tell you rather than build something fragile.
Both systems need a usable interface. An API, a supported export, or direct database access we are permitted to use. We confirm this before quoting, not after — because an integration promised against a system that cannot be reached is a project that cannot be delivered. If one side has no route in, we will say so at the enquiry stage and suggest what else might work.
The common ones with documented APIs — CRMs, accounting and ERP packages, messaging platforms, spreadsheets and databases — and older systems through whatever route they do expose. Tell us both names and we will check before quoting.
Common, particularly with established Indian accounting and industrial packages. There is often a scheduled export or database view that works. Where there genuinely is not, we will tell you rather than building something that breaks at the next update.
Logging and alerting on failures are part of the build. Ongoing monitoring is a support arrangement — worth having, because the characteristic failure of an integration is a silent one.
Where a hosted tool is genuinely the right answer, yes, and we will say so rather than building custom work you do not need. Where volume, data sensitivity or per-task pricing make it a poor fit, we will explain why.
You do. The integration runs against your accounts with access you can revoke. We ask for the narrowest permissions that do the job.
Yes. We invoice in Indian rupees and set out the payment route before you commit.
Name both systems and we will tell you whether they can be connected before anyone talks about price.
officials@kaizensparktech.com
A person reads that inbox.
We work with clients overseas and invoice in Indian rupees. Ask and we will set out the payment route before you commit.